Research Domain
Institutions & Authority
Who may decide, under what rules, and who remains accountable
Who may decide, under what rules, and who remains accountable?
Sponte studies how public, private, distributed, and algorithmic institutions create rules, allocate authority, monitor conduct, resolve disputes, and remain legitimate. Government remains a distinct case because coercive authority, constitutional constraints, and democratic accountability require safeguards that do not apply identically to firms or protocols.
Government and democracy: public administration, regulation, procurement, due process, civil liberties, state capacity, international coordination, and democratic accountability
Corporate governance: boards, management, ownership, duties, incentives, internal controls, and responsibility for automated decisions
Algorithmic and platform governance: rankings, protocols, moderation, access, automated decisions, interoperability, and ecosystem power
Institutional governance: universities, professions, standards bodies, scientific institutions, and nonprofits
Distributed governance: decentralized, cooperative, network, and polycentric systems
Infrastructure power: control of compute, data, cloud infrastructure, models, standards, and distribution
Assurance and accountability: certification, audit, monitoring, incident response, liability, appeal, remedy, and exit
Autonomous institutions: identity, commitments, contracting, delegation, and responsibility for machine agents
Inside Institutions & Authority
Questions, domains, and lines of inquiry
01
Research Questions
Research Questions
Who has authority to set, interpret, enforce, and change the rules? Which public, corporate, professional, or personal decisions may legitimately be delegated to algorithms? What e…
02
Research Implications
Implications
If the work succeeds: Technical capability is not mistaken for legitimate authority. Accountability follows real control rather than formal organization charts. Regulation and cert…